The agency vs in-house debate is rarely black and white. Both have genuine advantages. Both have significant downsides. The right choice depends on your stage, your budget, and what you’re actually trying to achieve.
The real cost of in-house
A skilled in-house digital marketer in Europe costs €40,000–€70,000 per year in salary alone. Add employer’s costs, training, tools, and management time and the real cost is €55,000–€90,000 per year. At that level of spend, you need a very high lead volume to justify it economically.
What agencies do better
- Access to cross-industry data and testing (what works across multiple clients)
- Specialist skills across multiple channels (one person can’t master Meta, Google, and SEO simultaneously)
- Faster onboarding — no recruitment, no training period
- Lower cost at lower spend levels — €399–€2,000/month vs €55,000/year in-house
- No redundancy risk — if it’s not working, you can exit cleanly
What in-house does better
- Deep product and brand knowledge built over time
- Faster creative iteration without briefing delays
- Better internal alignment with sales, product, and leadership
- More cost-effective above a certain spend level (usually €30k+/month in ad spend)
Our honest take: For most businesses spending under €10,000/month on ads, a specialist agency at €399–€1,500/month delivers better results than an in-house hire. Above that level, a hybrid model — in-house brand and content with an agency managing paid channels — often works best.
Want us to audit your campaigns?
Get a Free Audit — free, no obligation. We’ll tell you exactly what to fix first.
Want Results Like This for Your Digital Product?
We specialise in growing digital product businesses through paid ads and SEO. Free audit, no obligation.
WhatsApp for Free Audit